Archive for December, 2006

KALCHAs ANNAVARAM Box-Office Prediction…

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

ANNAVARAM is certainly among the worst movies of 2006. But that is from a critical point of view… Then what about its box-office fate? Well, it will also one of the biggest disasters of 2006. The only thing Pawan fans will get to rejoice is that it will not be as big a FLOP as JOHNY… The pattern will be more akin to BANGARAM.

In a Nutshell: Big Openings… Sudden drop in collections… Pawan fans would try to bring some good talk… But later, everyone including fans will forget that it even got released… No matter what the publicity says, it would be a deficit movie…

To read KALCHAs Annavaram Review click HERE.

KALCHAs ANNAVARAM Movie Review

Saturday, December 30th, 2006


ANNAVARAM CREDITS:

RELEASE DATE: 29 DEC,2006
GENRE: Sentimental/Action/Drama

CAST:
Pawan Kalyan, Asin, Sandhya, Siva Balaji, Venu Madhav, Naga Babu, Brahmanandam, Brahmaji, Sunil, Ali, Raghu Babu, Ranganath, Dharmavarapu, L.B. Sreeram, Suman Setty, Narsing Yadav, Lakshmipati, Hema, Surekha Vani, Telangana Sakuntala Etc.,

CREW:
DIALOGUES: Abburi Ravi
MUSIC: Ramana Gogula
BACKGROUND SCORE: Dina
CINEMATOGRAPHY: Sethu Sriram
ART: Anand Sai
EDITING: Goutam Raju
STUNTS: Vijayan
STORY: Perarasu
PAWAN KALYAN COSTUMES DESIGN: Renu Desai
PRODUCERS: N.V. Prasad & Paras Jain
BANNER: Mega Super Good Films
DIRECTION/SCREENPLAY: Bheemaneni Srinivasa Rao

EXPECTATIONS:
Remake specialist Bheemaneni Srinivasa Rao teaming up with Pawan Kalyan to make a mass flick and to top that, with village background seems interesting. But genuinely speaking I didn’t like the Tamil version TIRUPACHICHI… So I had my fingers crossed. Read on…

STORY:
The story is about a village guy Annavaram(Pawan Kalyan) who makes country weapons (knives and sickles) for a living. He loves his sister Varam(Sandhya) so much that he wants her to settle down marrying a city guy who can provide her with all the material comforts that are not inherently available in village. Narsimha(Venu Madhav) is his best pal. Annavaram arranges Varam’s marriage with a city guy(Siva Balaji). Varam and her husband settle in the city as her husband maintains a college canteen. Asin is their neighbour. Some hooligans harass the couple in the city which Annavaram comes to know after his best pal Narsimha dies because of some hooligans. The rest of the movie is all about how he eradicates the rowdies from the city so that his sister’s son can take birth in a peaceful city.

PERFORMANCES:
Pawan Kalyan as Annavaram lends a genuine sense of emotion to the character. He maintains a subtlety that is highly impossible in this brainless sentimental action drama. But on the flip side, after a long time he unnecessarily TRIES to dance a lot. Sandhya, a gutsy and natural actress is wasted in this spineless role. She just has to wear Pawan’s shirt a few times… that’s it.
The fact that Asin is a heroine in the movie is reminded to us a few times when the lead couple start dancing around aimlessly in the songs to give the audience much needed break to breathe fresh air or smoke. But the fact that she has the worst character that she played so far is evident when she blabbers in pure Telangana accent which even Telangana Sakuntala might not pull off…
Venu Madhav, Raghu Babu, M.S. Narayana, Dharmavarapu and Brahmaji are seasoned artists and they pull off the characters with ease.
Nagendra Babu has a couple of scenes which are really hilarious and he pulls them off with much aplomb.
Ashish Vidyarthi’s character as Tapas Balu is more of a comedian than villain. Not even a single time in the whole movie we get to see the villain that he is supposed to be… The entire fault lies with the script and the director who failed to etch out the character well.

OTHER DEPARTMENTS:
Dialogues by Abburi Ravi touched the lowest trough when Asin came in to the picture and the “Bond-James Bond” kind of dialogues by the hero, the villains (Raju-Pothu Raju by the hero, Balu-Tapas Balu by the villain) is a cheap attempt which could have been right in a comedy movie.
Art director Sai neither impresses nor disappoints. So nothing much to write on this.
Cinematography by Sethu Sreeram is the reason why Tollywood movies are failing to make a headway… First he has to learn to hold the camera still in many scenes.
Background score by Dina is below average to say the least.
Music by Ramana Gogula is mediocre but not as worst as the movie itself is… Many people would like the sister sentimental song but I didn’t mind to listen to the songs Mehbooba and the one in which Pawan dresses as a cowboy.

DIRECTION/SCREENPLAY:
Please someone lock up this director before some other well performing actors blindly sign him up and ruin their careers. To say that direction and screenplay are worst would be a huge understatement. In an ironical way this movie gives a double dose for the same buck. The first half is sentimental bakwas which never moves any heart in the theater. The second half is an action adventure which never makes the blood race through the veins… The director must be having his brain down his pants well below his knees… to make a hero character that goes on a killing spree which is not only unreal but also unpardonable. Bheemaneni is also proved to be a screenplay writer who doesn’t know how to etch out the characters well… leave alone the scenes.

HIGHLIGHTS:
The scene where Pawan enters the villain’s den posed as a sales man.
The funeral scene of Venu Madhav is well shot to elevate the emotional levels that were missing from the whole movie. In fact the scene is one of the most naturally shot funeral episodes out of the innumerable ones on our Indian screens.

BLUNDERS:
Firstly, the script.
Secondly Asin’s tryst with Telangana accent.
Thirdly, making two movies in a single movie i.e., First half being completely devoid of the second half.
Fourth, The introduction scene of Pawan kalyan where he comes with a long sickle and fights off a lengthy line of hugely built men (Come on guys, Size does matter…) in the water with ease and that too under a minute.
Fifth, Trying to play an old trick hiring Ramana Gogula for Pawan Kalyan whose music has gone bankrupt long ago.
Sixth, dialogues by Abburi Ravi many a time brings a loud laughter not in the comedy scenes but in the emotional scenes. Especially, when the prime characters utter James Bondish dialogues, our Telugu film standards seem to touch rock bottom. Pawan Kalyan looks ridiculous in the scenes where he adds a lemon to his weapon and utters the dialogue of VADHA.
Seventh, showing Sandhya’s womb using graphics when Pawan tries to talk to his yet to be born nephew over telephone. Our Telugu film directors never learn to use techniques at right places and more over this is not a SCI-FI movie.
The list is endless but lastly, to think that Telugu audience are fools and taking them for granted…

KALCHA’s ADVICE: My advice to everyone would be… to not only give Annavaram a miss, but also advice your friends and family to avoid this torture called Annavaram. I am here to take the punishment…

To know my prediction on ANNAVARAM’s Box-Office fate, read this POST.

You Can Cast Your VOTE:

post signature

KALCHAs PELLAINA KOTHALO Box-Office Prediction…

Monday, December 11th, 2006

Pellaina Kothalo is not a movie that would be talked about after a couple of months… But certainly, Priyamani is among the most promising newcomers in recent times… She is certainly destined for bigger things…

In a Nutshell: Pellaina Kothalo will be a certain dud in C centers and would be an average grosser in A and B centers… But it would garner a lot of positive talk which is not befitting the movie…
To read complete KALCHAs Pellaina Kothalo review… click HERE.

KALCHAs PELLAINA KOTHALO Movie Review…

Sunday, December 10th, 2006


MY ADVICE: I know every director cannot be Mani Ratnam but just watch SAKHI by Mani Ratnam if you are really interested in the subject of young married working couple.

MOVIE CREDITS:

MOVIE: PELLAINA KOTHALO
GENRE: FAMILY/DRAMA/COMMEDY
RIGHTS: STRAIGHT
BANNER: AA NALUGURU FILMS
MUSIC: AGASTHYA
CINEMATOGRAPHER: SURENDER REDDY
LYRICS: VETURI, CHAITANYA PRASAD AND UMA MAHESHWAR
STORY/SCREENPLAY/DIALOGUES/PRODUCER/DIRECTION: MADAN
ROLE PLAY (CAST): JAGAPATHI BABU, PRIYAMANI, AASTHA SINGHAL, RAJU SUNDARAM, VENU MADHAV, SUNIL, JHANSI, KRISHNA BHAGAVAN, ALI, KOTA SRINIVAS RAO, DHARMAVARAPU SUBRAHMANIAM, MS NARAYANA, GIRI BABU, RAJITHA AND GEETHANJALI, SANDESH, MADHU, HEMA, KOVAI SARALA AND OTHERS
RELEASE DATE: DEC 9, 2006
CHOREOGRAPHY: SIVA SHANKAR, RAJU SUNDARAM, VIDYA
EDITING: NANDAMURI HARI
CBFC RATING: U

BACKROUND:

· Priyamani is a new actress.
· Jagapathi Babu is in dire need of a hit after a series of flops, although Samanyudu was an average success.
· Madan who proved his mettle with Aa Naluguru is debuting as Director with this movie. Apart from directing, he also provides the story and scripts it too. As if that is not enough, he takes the risk of producing it under the banner of Aa Naluguru.

CONCEPT & STORY:

Pellaina Kothalo is all about the egoistic clashes between couples when both are working to keep up with this fast paced generation. It is all about how that couple separates with misunderstandings and reunites understanding the strong ethos of the institution called marriage.

Hari (Jagapathi Babu) works as a software engineer and Laxmi/Lucky (Priyamani) works as a call centre professional. They both earn big and lead pretty decent lives. Jagapathi has Krishna Bhagavan and Priyamani has Jahansi as their best pals and mentors. Both are equally dominating on their partners and try to preach their ethos as the lead couple are about to get married in an arranged way. Hema plays wife to Bhagavan and Sunil plays husband to Jhansi. Both are equally submissive and yet sensible with unflinching love towards their partners.

The hell breaks lose before the first night as the lead couple following their friend’s advice keep dominating each other and in turn avoid the first night. In the second half of the film the grand entry of grand parents solves the problem although it takes a Vratam to do so. In the end all goes well and the couple reunites.

MUSIC & LYRICS:

Agasthya’s music compositions for this movie have the potential to become commercially successful. But the range of success will be limited because of the “class only” appeal. Lyrics are refreshing in a couple of songs.

PERFOMANCES:

· Jagapathi Babu, the lead actor, is a very good comic timer and excels in family oriented movies. He is looking his recent best. He plays his character that will surely appeal to the wider audience although hardcore masses might not connect as they would not connect with the movie in the first place.
· Priyamani, the lead actress, is a fresh heroine and she definitely has a long innings ahead of her as she connects with every Telugu speaking person with her ease in acting. In fact unless you already know that she is not a Telugu speaking girl, you would take her to be a Telugu girl. Her traditional looks will appeal to many.
· Krishna Bhagavan is at his best in making the audience laugh with his witty dialogue delivery that is his trademark.
· Hema is very good with her role as Bhagavan’s submissive yet sensible wife.
· Brahmanandam and Kovai Sarala may generate some extra laughs but proves to be unnecessary and as a result irritating.
· Kota Srinivas and Geetanjali might click as the elderly couple with a strong bond of love between them.
· Venu madhav might not be connected directly to the movie but generates loudest laughs through out the theatre with his trademark comedy.
· M.S. Narayana is a bit on the irritating side even to the hardcore masses.
· Sunil and Jhansi perform their roles with ease.
· Raju Sundaram and Astha are unnecessary with an unnecessary song as an addition.

TECHNICIANS:

· Choreography is adequate and passable.
· Cinematography is just about O.K.
· Story, Screenplay, Dialogues, Direction are good in the first half and lacks the pace and deviates from the concept in the second half.


DON’T MIND MY MIND:

I expected a lot from this writer turned director Madan. I came out of the theatre disappointed.
· In the first half of the movie, screenplay is crisp. But in the second half of the movie, screenplay gets so worse that at times one is left wondering whether it is a soft porn movie or a family movie.
· The whole Vratam episode generates humor to start but soon turns out to be just too, three, four much. The elderly couple and their ever-romancing servants are just too clichéd and masaledar to be even considered dignified to the storyline that the director chose.
· Now to start with, it is very unconvincing that a newly married couple just won’t have any of the feelings that any couple would have entering the first night room. Then to just start arguing over silliest matters the same night and next and next and on shows how immaturely the script is written.
· The climax is highly boring with a message oriented song and speeches by the elderly couple who up to that moment were just interested to get the lead couple to get on bed to solve the entire problem.
· The only things I enjoyed in the movie are Krishna Bhagavan and Hema’s relationship. Then the conversation between Jagapathi and Priya over the phone. And a couple of beautiful romantic melodies by Agasthya.

To read KALCHAs prediction on Pellaina Kothalo’s box-office fate click HERE.

READERs RATING:

post signature